Trademark search for:

SYSTEM GOLD

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1991-07-08 — Application filed
1991-10-17 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1991-10-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
1992-02-21 — Notice of publication
1992-03-24 — Published for opposition
1992-06-16 — Registered-principal register
1998-06-12 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1998-09-10 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2002-04-08 — Paper received
2002-04-08 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2002-06-13 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2002-06-13 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2008-01-30 — Case file in ticrs
2008-03-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2008-03-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2010-03-03 — Teas change of owner address received
2010-03-03 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2015-06-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2015-06-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2016-01-29 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-01-29 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

BECKMAN COULTER, INC.
Brea , CA

Beckman Instruments, Inc.
Fullerton , CA

Beckman Instruments, Inc.
Fullerton , CA

Beckman Instruments, Inc.
Fullerton , CA

Correspondent

Charles C. Wong BECKMAN COULTER, INC.
250 S. Kraemer Blvd.
Brea, CA 92821
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1991-07-08

Status Date:
2016-01-29

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
1991

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.