Brandinium

Trademark search for:

EC ENLIGHT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1992-10-13 — Application filed
  • 1993-01-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 1993-04-08 — Examiner's amendment mailed
  • 1993-04-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1993-05-14 — Notice of publication
  • 1993-06-15 — Published for opposition
  • 1993-09-07 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 1994-03-01 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 1994-04-18 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 1994-07-21 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 1994-07-21 — Use amendment filed
  • 1994-08-31 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 1994-08-31 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 1994-09-21 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1994-09-21 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 1995-02-28 — Registered-principal register
  • 2000-08-08 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 2000-11-01 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2005-01-28 — Paper received
  • 2005-01-28 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2005-03-23 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2005-03-23 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2020-04-03 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2020-04-03 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

ENLIGHT CORPORATION
KWEISHAN, TAOYUAN TW
ENLIGHT CORPORATION
Kweishan, Taoyuan TW
ENLIGHT CORPORATION
Kweishan, Taoyuan TW

Correspondent

MARCIA A AUBERGER VENABLE LLP
PO BOX 34385
WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1992-10-13
Status Date:
2020-04-03
Filing Year:
1992

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.