Trademark search for:

INPOSITION

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1992-04-17 — Application filed
1992-06-15 — Assigned to examiner
1992-06-18 — Assigned to examiner
1992-07-06 — Final disposition recorded
1992-12-24 — Correspondence received in law office
1993-01-14 — Letter of suspension mailed
1993-03-10 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
1993-07-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
1993-08-20 — Notice of publication
1993-09-21 — Published for opposition
1993-12-14 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1994-01-21 — Use amendment filed
1994-03-21 — Statement of use processing complete
1994-04-20 — Assigned to examiner
1994-04-25 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
1994-07-19 — Registered-principal register
2000-06-12 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2000-09-28 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2002-09-12 — Paper received
2004-07-19 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2004-07-19 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2004-09-20 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2004-09-20 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2011-04-05 — Case file in ticrs
2016-02-26 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-02-26 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

LES LOGICIELS DYNAGRAM INC.
QUEBECGIK 3J4 CA

DK&A, Inc.
San Diego , CA

DK&A, Inc.
San Diego , CA

DK&A, Inc.
San Diego , CA

Correspondent

SIMON LEMAY LAVERY DE BILLY
925, CHEMIN SAINT-LOUIS, STE 500
QUEBEC, QC G1S 1C1
CANADA

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1992-04-17

Status Date:
2016-02-26

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
1992

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.