Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1992 ›
ME ›
MENTEC
Trademark search for:
MENTEC
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1992-01-24 — Application filed
1992-03-17 — Assigned to examiner
1992-03-31 — Assigned to examiner
1992-04-29 — Final disposition recorded
1992-10-27 — Correspondence received in law office
1993-02-02 — Office action issued
1993-07-09 — Correspondence received in law office
1993-07-28 — Assigned to examiner
1993-07-28 — Letter of suspension mailed
1994-02-02 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
1994-06-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
1994-10-14 — Notice of publication
1994-11-15 — Published for opposition
1995-02-07 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1995-07-31 — Use amendment filed
1995-08-23 — Statement of use processing complete
1995-08-29 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
1995-10-17 — Registered-principal register
1996-03-13 — Sec 7 request filed
1996-09-20 — Correction under section 7 - processed
2001-09-10 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2001-09-27 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2006-07-22 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2006-07-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Mentec Computer Systems Limited
County Dublin IE
Mentec Computer Systems Limited
County Dublin IE
Mentec Computer Systems Limited
County Dublin IE
Correspondent
GARY D KRUGMAN SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN, MACPEAK & SEAS 2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N W WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1992-01-24
Status Date:
2006-07-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.