Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1994 ›
CL ›
CLORIUS
Trademark search for:
CLORIUS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-11-04 — Application filed
2003-12-01 — Application filed
2004-04-27 — Assigned to examiner
2004-05-12 — Final disposition recorded
2004-07-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-11-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-11-08 — Office action issued
2004-11-16 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-12-13 — Office action issued
2004-12-14 — Office action issued
2005-05-25 — Office action issued
2005-05-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-06-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-06-22 — Examiners amendment mailed
2005-06-22 — Examiners amendment -written
2005-06-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-06-24 — Assigned to lie
2005-06-27 — Law office publication review completed
2005-09-21 — Notice of publication
2005-10-11 — Published for opposition
2006-01-03 — Registered-principal register
2006-07-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-01-16 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2008-01-16 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2012-10-05 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2012-10-05 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Viterra Energy Services GmbH & Co. KG
Essen DE
Viterra Energy Services GmbH & Co. KG
Essen DE
Viterra Energy Services GmbH & Co. KG
Essen DE
Correspondent
Katrin Lewertoff Arent Fox LLP 1675 Broadway New York, NY 10019 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-11-04
Status Date:
2012-10-05
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.