Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1994 ›
PO ›
POCKET DOC
Trademark search for:
POCKET DOC
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-11-09 — Application filed
2007-11-15 — Application filed
2007-11-17 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2008-02-25 — Assigned to examiner
2008-02-29 — Suspension letter written
2008-02-29 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-02-29 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-08-29 — Assigned to lie
2008-08-29 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2008-09-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-09-25 — Law office publication review completed
2008-10-08 — Notice of publication
2008-10-28 — Published for opposition
2009-01-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-02-12 — Teas statement of use received
2009-02-12 — Use amendment filed
2009-03-03 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-03-03 — Statement of use processing complete
2009-03-19 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2009-03-19 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-03-19 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-03-19 — Examiner's amendment entered
2009-03-19 — Su-examiner's amendment written
2009-03-20 — Law office registration review completed
2009-03-20 — Assigned to lie
2009-04-28 — Registered-principal register
2015-12-04 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2015-12-04 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
PEPID
Evanston , IL
PEPID
Evanston , IL
PEPID
Evanston , IL
Correspondent
Randall Edgar PEPID 1840 OAK AVE STE 100 EVANSTON, IL 60201-3666 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-11-09
Status Date:
2015-12-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.