Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1994 ›
PR ›
PRACTICAL PERIPHERALS
Trademark search for:
PRACTICAL PERIPHERALS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-04-06 — Application filed
2007-04-10 — Application filed
2007-07-20 — Assigned to examiner
2007-07-21 — Final disposition recorded
2007-07-23 — Final disposition recorded
2008-01-22 — Paper received
2008-02-21 — Amendment from applicant entered
2008-02-21 — Assigned to lie
2008-02-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-03-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-03-12 — Law office publication review completed
2008-03-26 — Notice of publication
2008-04-15 — Published for opposition
2008-07-08 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-01-07 — Sou teas extension received
2009-01-07 — Sou extension 1 filed
2009-01-07 — Sou extension 1 granted
2009-05-15 — Assigned to examiner
2009-07-07 — Sou teas extension received
2009-07-07 — Sou extension 2 filed
2009-07-30 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-07-30 — Sou extension 2 granted
2010-01-08 — Sou teas extension received
2010-01-08 — Sou extension 3 filed
2010-01-08 — Sou extension 3 granted
2010-08-09 — Application abandoned
2010-08-09 — Application abandoned
2010-08-09 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
ZOOM Telephonics, Inc.
Boston , MA
ZOOM Telephonics, Inc.
Boston , MA
Correspondent
John L. DuPré HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, P.C. 530 Virginia Road, P.O. Box 9133 CONCORD, MA 01742-9133 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-04-06
Status Date:
2010-08-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.