Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1995 ›
DI ›
DIGIPHONE
Trademark search for:
DIGIPHONE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2016-06-12 — Application filed
2016-06-15 — Application filed
2016-06-18 — Application filed
2016-09-06 — Assigned to examiner
2016-09-09 — Examiners amendment -written
2016-09-09 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2016-09-09 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2016-09-09 — Examiner's amendment entered
2016-09-23 — Final disposition recorded
2016-09-23 — Final disposition recorded
2016-09-23 — Final disposition recorded
2016-11-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-03-22 — Office action issued
2017-03-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-03-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-04-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-05-03 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-05-23 — Published for opposition
2017-05-23 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-06-22 — Extension of time to oppose received
2017-09-20 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2018-04-24 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2018-04-24 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
2018-04-24 — Ttab release case to trademarks
2018-06-05 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2019-01-07 — Application abandoned
2019-01-07 — Application abandoned
2019-01-07 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
RAYNALDO GARZA
Las Vegas , NV
RAYNALDO GARZA
Las Vegas , NV
Correspondent
RAYNALDO GARZA 1350 EAST FLAMINGO RD #3344 LAS VEGAS, NV 89119 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2016-06-12
Status Date:
2019-01-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.