Brandinium

Trademark search for:

PLUG-N-GO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2003-12-01 — Application filed
  • 2003-12-24 — Application filed
  • 2004-06-22 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2004-06-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2004-10-22 — Paper received
  • 2004-10-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-11-05 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2004-11-18 — Office action issued
  • 2004-11-18 — Office action issued
  • 2005-05-23 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2005-08-03 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2006-07-11 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2006-07-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2006-07-21 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-08-01 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2006-08-30 — Notice of publication
  • 2006-09-19 — Published for opposition
  • 2006-12-12 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2007-06-08 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2007-06-08 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2007-06-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2007-12-10 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2007-12-10 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2007-12-10 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2008-06-09 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2008-06-09 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2008-06-09 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2008-11-01 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2008-12-11 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2008-12-11 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2008-12-11 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2009-03-12 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2009-03-12 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2009-06-04 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-06-04 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2009-06-04 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2009-12-11 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2009-12-11 — Use amendment filed
  • 2010-01-25 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-01-26 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2010-03-15 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2010-03-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2010-03-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2010-03-30 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2010-03-30 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-03-31 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2010-05-04 — Registered-principal register
  • 2013-12-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-12-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2014-02-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2014-02-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2014-02-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2014-02-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-05-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2015-08-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-08-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2015-08-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-08-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-10-14 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2016-12-09 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2016-12-09 — Final status recorded
  • 2017-01-25 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership

Owner Information

QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
CAMBRIDGE GB
QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
CAMBRIDGE GB
Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited
Cambridge CB40WH GB
Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited
Cambridge CB40WH GB
Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited
Cambridge GB

Correspondent

N. Christopher Norton Arent Fox LLP
1717 K St., NW
Washington, DC 20006
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-12-01
Status Date:
2016-12-09
Filing Year:
1995

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.