Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1996 ›
FA ›
FAMILY SYSTEMS
Trademark search for:
FAMILY SYSTEMS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1996-10-08 — Application filed
1997-05-23 — Assigned to examiner
1997-06-03 — Final disposition recorded
1997-12-03 — Correspondence received in law office
1998-01-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
1998-02-07 — Notice of publication
1998-03-10 — Published for opposition
1998-06-02 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1998-10-26 — Sou extension 1 filed
1998-11-18 — Sou extension 1 granted
1999-06-02 — Sou extension 2 filed
1999-06-28 — Sou extension 2 granted
1999-11-05 — Sou extension 3 filed
1999-12-10 — Sou extension 3 granted
2000-05-18 — Sou extension 4 filed
2000-08-01 — Sou extension 4 granted
2000-11-21 — Sou extension 5 filed
2001-01-22 — Sou extension 5 granted
2001-05-31 — Use amendment filed
2001-06-08 — Statement of use processing complete
2001-06-15 — Assigned to examiner
2001-06-18 — Final disposition recorded
2001-12-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-06-18 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2002-09-10 — Registered-principal register
2008-01-24 — Case file in ticrs
2009-05-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2009-05-16 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
FAMILY SYSTEMS LIMITED
Douglas GB
FAMILY SYSTEMS LIMITED
Douglas GB
FAMILY SYSTEMS LIMITED
Douglas GB
Correspondent
BREWSTER TAYLOR LARSON & TAYLOR 1199 N FAIRFAX ST STE 900 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1996-10-08
Status Date:
2009-05-16
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.