Trademark search for:

HSV-500C3

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1996-11-06 — Application filed
1997-06-10 — Assigned to examiner
1997-06-13 — Final disposition recorded
1997-06-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
1997-07-18 — Notice of publication
1997-08-19 — Published for opposition
1997-11-11 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1997-12-09 — Use amendment filed
1998-01-31 — Statement of use processing complete
1998-02-04 — Assigned to examiner
1998-02-04 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
1998-04-14 — Registered-principal register
2003-05-23 — Paper received
2003-05-23 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2003-08-02 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2007-05-07 — Case file in ticrs
2008-01-17 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2008-01-22 — Assigned to paralegal
2008-02-05 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2008-02-05 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2017-04-14 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2021-10-22 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-10-22 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

NAC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
Tokyo JP

NAC, INC.
SIMI VALLEY , CA

NAC VISUAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Simi Valley , CA

NAC VISUAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Simi Valley , CA

NAC VISUAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Simi Valley , CA

Correspondent

W. EDGAR JESSUP, JR., ESQ. ERVIN COHEN & JESSUP LLP
9401 WILSHIRE BLVD., NINTH FL
BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-2974
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1996-11-06

Status Date:
2021-10-22

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
1996

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.