Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1996 ›
PO ›
POWERHELIX
Trademark search for:
POWERHELIX
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-03-03 — Application filed
2005-03-10 — Application filed
2005-09-24 — Final disposition recorded
2005-09-24 — Final disposition recorded
2005-09-24 — Assigned to examiner
2005-11-21 — Office action issued
2005-11-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-12-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-12-10 — Suspension letter written
2005-12-10 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2006-06-21 — Suspension inquiry written
2006-06-21 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2006-10-06 — Office action issued
2006-10-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-10-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-10-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-10-27 — Assigned to lie
2006-10-31 — Assigned to lie
2006-11-03 — Law office publication review completed
2006-12-06 — Notice of publication
2006-12-26 — Published for opposition
2007-03-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-04-27 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2007-04-27 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2007-05-14 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2007-06-19 — Registered-principal register
2014-01-24 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2014-01-24 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Sarantel Limited
Leeds GB
Sarantel Limited
Leeds GB
Sarantel Limited
Leeds GB
Correspondent
BINGHAM B LEVERICH KATHLEEN T GALLA COVINGTON & BURLING 1201 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2401 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-03-03
Status Date:
2014-01-24
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.