Trademark search for:

NEXT LEVEL COMMUNICATIONS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1997-01-22 — Application filed
1997-09-05 — Assigned to examiner
1997-09-13 — Assigned to examiner
1997-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
1998-03-03 — Use amendment filed
1998-03-19 — Correspondence received in law office
1998-05-05 — Amendment to use processing complete
1998-10-21 — Assigned to examiner
1998-11-18 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1998-12-15 — Use amendment accepted
1998-12-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
1999-04-09 — Notice of publication
1999-05-11 — Published for opposition
1999-06-09 — Extension of time to oppose received
1999-07-27 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2001-08-17 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
2001-08-17 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2001-10-02 — Registered-principal register
2001-12-03 — Sec 7 request filed
2002-03-21 — Correction under section 7 - processed
2002-05-28 — Sec 7 request filed
2005-03-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2005-03-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-02-13 — Case file in ticrs
2008-07-04 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2008-07-04 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

NEXT LEVEL COMMUNICATIONS , INC.
ROHNERT PARK , CA

NEXT LEVEL COMMUNICATIONS L.P.
ROHNERT PARK , CA

NEXT LEVEL COMMUNICATIONS L.P.
ROHNERT PARK , CA

Next Level Communications
Rohnert Park , CA

Correspondent

ARCH M AHERN MOTOROLA INC
600 N US HWY 45
LIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1997-01-22

Status Date:
2008-07-04

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
1997

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.