Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1997 ›
PR ›
PROSPECTIVE CONCEPTS
Trademark search for:
PROSPECTIVE CONCEPTS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1997-08-28 — Application filed
1998-05-21 — Assigned to examiner
1998-06-04 — Final disposition recorded
1998-12-07 — Correspondence received in law office
1999-02-16 — Office action issued
1999-08-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2000-01-28 — Office action issued
2000-02-22 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2000-03-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
2000-05-05 — Notice of publication
2000-06-06 — Published for opposition
2000-08-29 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2001-02-26 — Sou extension 1 filed
2001-04-03 — Sou extension 1 granted
2001-08-28 — Sou extension 2 filed
2001-09-11 — Sou extension 2 granted
2002-02-25 — Sou extension 3 filed
2002-03-26 — Sou extension 3 granted
2002-06-14 — Petition to director received
2002-08-28 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2002-09-18 — Petition to director granted
2003-10-06 — Fax received
2003-10-06 — Paper received
2004-04-12 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
2004-10-27 — Notice of publication
2004-11-16 — Published for opposition
2005-02-08 — Registered-principal register
2011-09-09 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2011-09-09 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Prospective Concepts AG
8702 Zollikon CH
Prospective Concepts AG
8702 Zollikon CH
Prospective Concepts AG
8702 Zollikon CH
Correspondent
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIE 1 PRUDENTIAL PLZ 130 E RANDOLPH STE 3500 CHICAGO, IL 60601
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1997-08-28
Status Date:
2011-09-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.