Trademark search for:

SECURECAM

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2002-11-19 — Application filed
2003-03-26 — Assigned to examiner
2003-04-18 — Final disposition recorded
2003-10-20 — Paper received
2003-10-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-11-21 — Assigned to examiner
2003-11-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-12-31 — Notice of publication
2004-01-20 — Published for opposition
2004-04-13 — Registered-principal register
2005-08-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
2010-04-07 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2010-04-19 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2010-04-21 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2013-08-01 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2013-08-01 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2013-08-19 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2013-08-19 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2013-08-19 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2013-08-19 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
2023-04-13 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2024-10-25 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2024-10-25 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Secure Vue, Inc.
West Islip , NY

Secure Vue, Inc.
New York , NY

Secure Vue, Inc.
New York , NY

Correspondent

Elizabeth A. Corradino, Esq. MOSES & SINGER LLP
THE CHRYSLER BUILDING
405 LEXINGTON AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10174-1299

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-11-19

Status Date:
2024-10-25

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
1997

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.