Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1997 ›
TT ›
T-NETCALL
Trademark search for:
T-NETCALL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1997-11-24 — Application filed
1998-05-26 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
1998-07-13 — Assigned to examiner
1998-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
1999-02-05 — Correspondence received in law office
1999-03-08 — Letter of suspension mailed
1999-11-17 — Assigned to examiner
2000-07-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2000-09-05 — Letter of suspension mailed
2002-04-08 — Paper received
2002-04-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-04-29 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
2002-05-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-03-08 — Case file in ticrs
2004-04-20 — Letter of suspension mailed
2004-10-26 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2004-11-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-12-06 — Assigned to lie
2004-12-06 — Law office publication review completed
2005-03-07 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2005-03-07 — Assigned to examiner
2005-04-18 — Assigned to examiner
2005-05-12 — Final disposition recorded
2005-05-13 — Final disposition recorded
2005-08-31 — Application abandoned
2005-08-31 — Application abandoned
2005-08-31 — Application abandoned
2005-08-31 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Deutsche Telekom AG
D-53113 Bonn DE
Correspondent
EDWARD E VASSALLO FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO 30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ NEW YORK, NY 10112-3899 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1997-11-24
Status Date:
2005-08-31
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.