Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1997 ›
WA ›
WAVESTICK
Trademark search for:
WAVESTICK
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1997-06-02 — Application filed
1998-02-02 — Assigned to examiner
1998-02-17 — Final disposition recorded
1998-04-01 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
1998-06-12 — Correspondence received in law office
1998-10-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
1998-11-27 — Notice of publication
1998-12-29 — Published for opposition
1999-03-23 — Registered-principal register
2005-03-16 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2005-03-16 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2006-05-06 — Assigned to paralegal
2006-05-06 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2009-03-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2009-03-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2009-03-16 — Paper received
2009-03-16 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2009-03-20 — Assigned to paralegal
2009-03-24 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2009-03-24 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2021-10-29 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-10-29 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Krohne MeBtechnik GmbH & Co. KG
Duisburg DE
Krohne MeBtechnik GmbH & Co. KG
47058 Duisburg DE
Krohne MeBtechnik GmbH & Co. KG
47058 Duisburg DE
Correspondent
Thomas S. Baker, Jr. Thomas S. Baker, Jr., Attorney at Law, LLC 1371 West 3rd Avenue Columbus, OH 43212 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1997-06-02
Status Date:
2021-10-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.