Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CHEMEL

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1998-04-08 — Application filed
  • 1998-12-08 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1999-01-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 1999-07-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1999-10-12 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2000-05-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2000-12-06 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2000-12-14 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2001-06-04 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-01-13 — Office action issued
  • 2003-03-14 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2003-03-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2003-06-11 — Notice of publication
  • 2003-07-01 — Published for opposition
  • 2003-09-23 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2003-09-29 — Fax received
  • 2004-03-03 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2004-03-03 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
  • 2004-04-20 — Registered-principal register
  • 2007-06-21 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2009-05-26 — Paper received
  • 2009-05-26 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 2009-06-04 — Assigned to paralegal
  • 2009-06-17 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2014-11-21 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2014-11-21 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Chemel AB
S-223 70 Lund SE
Chemel AB
S-223 70 Lund SE
Chemel AB
S-223 70 Lund SE

Correspondent

NORMAN H ZIVIN COOPER & DUNHAM LLP
30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA
NEW YORK, NY 10112
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1998-04-08
Status Date:
2014-11-21
Filing Year:
1998

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.