Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1999 ›
DI ›
DINEL
Trademark search for:
DINEL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1999-11-22 — Application filed
2000-04-27 — Assigned to examiner
2000-05-08 — Final disposition recorded
2000-06-18 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
2000-07-18 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2000-07-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
2000-09-22 — Notice of publication
2000-10-24 — Published for opposition
2001-01-16 — Registered-principal register
2002-06-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-07-14 — Case file in ticrs
2007-01-15 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-01-15 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-01-15 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2007-01-15 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2007-02-16 — Assigned to paralegal
2007-02-23 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2011-01-14 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2011-01-21 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2011-02-28 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2011-02-28 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2020-01-16 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2021-11-12 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-11-12 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
DINEL
76220 GOURNAY -EN-BRAY FR
DINEL
76220 GOURNAY -EN-BRAY FR
DINEL
76220 GOURNAY -EN-BRAY FR
Correspondent
Scott S. Havlick Holland & Hart LLP P.O. Box 8749 Denver, CO 80201 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1999-11-22
Status Date:
2021-11-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.