Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
1999 ›
NE ›
NEXICOM
Trademark search for:
NEXICOM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1999-01-28 — Application filed
1999-07-19 — Assigned to examiner
1999-07-29 — Final disposition recorded
2000-01-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2000-07-14 — Assigned to examiner
2000-07-17 — Letter of suspension mailed
2001-04-12 — Assigned to examiner
2001-04-13 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2001-10-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-11-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-03-13 — Office action issued
2002-09-25 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2002-11-01 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2002-11-01 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2002-11-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-03-19 — Notice of publication
2003-04-08 — Published for opposition
2003-04-17 — Extension of time to oppose received
2003-04-18 — Exparte appeal terminated
2003-04-19 — Exparte appeal terminated
2003-10-04 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2004-06-15 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2004-06-15 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2004-06-15 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2004-06-15 — Application abandoned
2004-06-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Nexicom Systems Inc.
Toronto, Ontario M6S 4J5 CA
Nexicom Systems Inc.
Toronto, Ontario M6S 4J5 CA
Correspondent
JAMES W MCKEE FAY SHARPE BEALL FAGAN MINNICH ET AL 1100 SUPERIOR AVE 7TH FL CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1999-01-28
Status Date:
2004-06-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.