Trademark search for:

UNIFY DATASERVER

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1999-06-03 — Application filed
1999-11-05 — Assigned to examiner
1999-11-23 — Final disposition recorded
2000-05-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-01-17 — Assigned to examiner
2001-03-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-10-10 — Notice of publication
2001-10-30 — Published for opposition
2002-01-22 — Registered-principal register
2002-07-30 — Counterclaim opp. no. 999999
2007-04-18 — Case file in ticrs
2007-12-21 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2007-12-21 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-12-21 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-12-27 — Assigned to paralegal
2008-02-01 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 15
2008-05-09 — Paper received
2008-05-09 — Response received to post reg. action - sec. 8 & 15
2008-05-22 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2010-07-07 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2011-07-20 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2011-10-26 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2012-08-24 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2012-08-24 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

UNIFY CORPORATION
SACRAMENTO , CA

UNIFY CORPORATION
Sacramento , CA

UNIFY CORPORATION
Sacramento , CA

Correspondent

David J. Davis Baker & McKenzie
130 East Randolph Drive
Suite 3500
Chicago, IL 60601

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1999-06-03

Status Date:
2012-08-24

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
1999

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.