Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2000 ›
CL ›
CLASSICOM
Trademark search for:
CLASSICOM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2000-02-04 — Application filed
2000-06-26 — Assigned to examiner
2000-07-07 — Final disposition recorded
2000-09-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-07-26 — Assigned to examiner
2001-07-26 — Examiners amendment mailed
2001-08-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-01-30 — Notice of publication
2002-02-19 — Published for opposition
2002-05-14 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2002-11-12 — Sou extension 1 filed
2002-11-14 — Paper received
2003-02-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
2003-05-08 — Sou extension 2 filed
2003-05-12 — Paper received
2003-05-27 — Paper received
2003-06-08 — Sou extension 2 granted
2003-06-30 — Paper received
2003-11-12 — Sou extension 3 filed
2003-11-17 — Paper received
2003-12-15 — Sou extension 3 granted
2004-05-14 — Sou extension 4 filed
2004-07-08 — Application abandoned
2004-07-21 — Paper received
2004-08-16 — Reinstated
2004-08-16 — Sou extension 4 granted
2004-10-07 — Paper received
2004-10-07 — Sou extension 5 filed
2004-12-14 — Sou extension 5 granted
2005-05-15 — Final status recorded
2005-09-27 — Application abandoned
2005-09-28 — Application abandoned
2016-01-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
CLASSICOM
GREAT NECK , NY
CLASSICOM
GREAT NECK , NY
Correspondent
JOSEPH SOFER SOFER & HAROUN LLP 215 Lexington Ave 1301 NEW YORK, NY 10016
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2000-02-04
Status Date:
2005-05-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.