Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CLICKFORECAST

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2000-02-11 — Application filed
  • 2000-07-21 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2000-07-24 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2001-01-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2001-02-26 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
  • 2001-07-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2001-10-16 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2002-12-30 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-10-06 — Paper received
  • 2003-10-06 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-10-31 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2003-11-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2003-12-17 — Notice of publication
  • 2004-01-06 — Published for opposition
  • 2004-03-30 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2004-08-13 — Paper received
  • 2004-08-13 — Use amendment filed
  • 2004-08-13 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2004-09-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2004-09-08 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2004-09-09 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2004-09-09 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2004-09-10 — Assigned to lie
  • 2004-09-21 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2004-11-16 — Registered-principal register
  • 2009-04-01 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2009-04-01 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2009-04-06 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2009-04-06 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2009-04-16 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-04-16 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2010-05-06 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2010-05-06 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2010-05-25 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2010-06-10 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2010-06-10 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2014-09-22 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2014-10-02 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
  • 2014-10-02 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2014-10-02 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2014-10-02 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2015-07-22 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2015-07-29 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2019-02-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2019-02-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2019-11-07 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2019-11-07 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-04-13 — Teas section 7 request received
  • 2020-05-11 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2020-05-12 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 7
  • 2020-07-15 — Office action issued
  • 2020-08-11 — Correction under section 7 - processed
  • 2020-09-15 — Otqr withdrawal from publication
  • 2020-09-16 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2020-09-17 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 7
  • 2023-11-16 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2024-06-05 — Application abandoned
  • 2025-05-30 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2025-05-30 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

CLICKSOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD
Petach-tikva IL
CLICKSOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Petach-tikva IL
CLICKSOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Petach-tikva IL
CLICKSERVICE SOFTWARE LTD.
Tel Aviv IL

Correspondent

Beth M. Goldman Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
2050 Main Street, Suite 1100
IP Prosecution Department
Irvine, CA 92614-8255

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2000-02-11
Status Date:
2025-05-30
Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.