Trademark search for:

COPERNIC AGGREGATOR

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2000-11-20 — Application filed
2001-04-27 — Assigned to examiner
2001-05-13 — Assigned to examiner
2001-06-12 — Assigned to examiner
2001-06-13 — Final disposition recorded
2001-11-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-04-09 — Letter of suspension mailed
2002-05-07 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
2002-11-08 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2003-03-07 — Paper received
2003-03-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-04-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-05-28 — Notice of publication
2003-06-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2003-06-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
2003-06-17 — Published for opposition
2003-09-09 — Registered-principal register
2004-11-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-01-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2005-01-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2006-12-13 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2007-06-29 — Case file in ticrs
2010-04-17 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2010-04-17 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

MAMMA.COM INC.
MONTREAL CA

COPERNIC TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Sainte-Foy, Quebec GlP 4N3 CA

COPERNIC TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Sainte-Foy, Quebec GlP 4N3 CA

COPERNIC TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Sainte-Foy, Quebec GlP 4N3 CA

Correspondent

DAVID E WESLOW SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP
1275 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20004
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2000-11-20

Status Date:
2010-04-17

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.