Brandinium

Trademark search for:

EXETENDER

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2000-08-30 — Application filed
  • 2001-02-15 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2001-02-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2001-08-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2001-11-10 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2001-11-15 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2003-10-21 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2004-10-22 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2005-01-21 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2005-01-24 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2005-03-30 — Paper received
  • 2005-03-30 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-04-12 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-04-22 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-04-22 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2005-10-24 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2005-11-04 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2005-11-04 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2006-02-07 — Paper received
  • 2006-03-07 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2006-05-04 — Office action issued
  • 2006-05-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-05-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-05-24 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-05-24 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2006-11-27 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-11-27 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2006-11-27 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2006-11-27 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2007-01-08 — Paper received
  • 2007-01-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-01-09 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2007-01-26 — Suspension letter written
  • 2007-01-29 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2007-07-30 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2007-08-13 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2007-08-14 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2008-02-12 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2008-02-12 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2008-02-13 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2008-02-14 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-02-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-03-06 — Suspension letter written
  • 2008-03-07 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2008-09-08 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2008-09-25 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2008-09-26 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2009-03-24 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2009-03-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-03-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-03-26 — Data modification completed
  • 2009-04-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-04-01 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-04-15 — Notice of publication
  • 2009-05-05 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-07-28 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-01-06 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2010-01-06 — Use amendment filed
  • 2010-02-08 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-02-08 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2010-03-01 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2010-03-02 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2010-04-06 — Registered-principal register
  • 2016-11-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2016-11-11 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Exent Technologies Ltd.
Petach - Tikva IL
Exent Technologies Ltd.
Petach - Tikva IL
Exent Technologies Ltd.
Petach - Tikva IL

Correspondent

Tracy-Gene G. Durkin Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2000-08-30
Status Date:
2016-11-11
Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.