Brandinium

Trademark search for:

EXODY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2000-01-13 — Application filed
  • 2000-07-11 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2000-07-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2001-01-16 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2001-07-16 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2002-06-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2002-07-26 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2003-09-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2004-05-24 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2004-09-02 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2005-04-05 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2005-05-15 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-05-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2005-12-02 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-03-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-07-25 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2006-07-28 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-08-29 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2006-08-29 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-03-01 — Paper received
  • 2007-04-04 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-04-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-04-04 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2007-04-23 — Suspension letter written
  • 2007-04-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-10-23 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-05-05 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2008-05-27 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2008-05-27 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-05-27 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-11-24 — Paper received
  • 2008-11-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-11-25 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2008-12-16 — Suspension letter written
  • 2008-12-16 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-12-16 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-06-16 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-06-17 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2009-06-30 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2009-06-30 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-06-30 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-12-30 — Paper received
  • 2010-01-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-01-04 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2010-01-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-01-05 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-01-05 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-01-05 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-07-06 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-07-06 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-07-06 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-01-06 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2011-01-06 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-01-06 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-07-11 — Paper received
  • 2011-07-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-07-19 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2011-07-19 — Suspension letter written
  • 2011-07-19 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-07-19 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-01-19 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2012-02-13 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2012-02-13 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-02-13 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-08-16 — Paper received
  • 2012-08-20 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-08-20 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2012-08-20 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-08-20 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-08-20 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-02-25 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2013-02-25 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2013-02-25 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-02-25 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-09-03 — Paper received
  • 2013-09-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-09-10 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2013-09-10 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-09-10 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-09-10 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-03-10 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2014-03-11 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2014-03-11 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-03-11 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-04-09 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2014-09-15 — Paper received
  • 2014-09-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-09-22 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2014-09-22 — Suspension letter written
  • 2014-09-22 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-09-22 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-03-23 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2015-03-26 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2015-03-26 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-03-26 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-10-02 — Paper received
  • 2015-10-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-10-07 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2015-10-07 — Suspension letter written
  • 2015-10-07 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-10-07 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-04-07 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2016-04-07 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2016-04-07 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-04-07 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-10-11 — Paper received
  • 2016-10-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2016-10-19 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2016-10-20 — Suspension letter written
  • 2016-10-20 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2016-10-20 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-04-25 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2017-04-25 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2017-04-25 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-04-25 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-11-02 — Paper received
  • 2017-11-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2017-11-07 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2017-11-15 — Suspension letter written
  • 2017-11-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2017-11-15 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2018-05-21 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2018-05-22 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2018-05-22 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2018-05-22 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2018-11-26 — Paper received
  • 2018-11-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-11-26 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2018-11-26 — Suspension letter written
  • 2018-11-26 — Correspondence e-mailed
  • 2019-06-03 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2019-06-03 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2019-06-03 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2019-06-03 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2019-12-03 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2019-12-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2019-12-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2019-12-23 — Suspension letter written
  • 2019-12-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2019-12-23 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2020-05-13 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2020-05-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2020-05-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2020-05-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2020-12-02 — Application abandoned
  • 2020-12-02 — Application abandoned
  • 2020-12-02 — Application abandoned
  • 2020-12-02 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

HLP Products GmbH
65760 Eschborn DE

Correspondent

Burton S. Ehrlich LADAS & PARRY LLP
224 S. Michigan Avenue
Suite 1600
Chicago, IL 60604

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2000-01-13
Status Date:
2020-12-02
Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.