Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ICAGENT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2000-11-28 — Application filed
  • 2001-03-19 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2001-03-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2001-09-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2002-06-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2002-08-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2002-08-30 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-11-01 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2003-07-01 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2003-09-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2004-01-05 — Paper received
  • 2004-01-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-01-13 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2004-02-13 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2004-08-16 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2004-08-31 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2004-08-31 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2005-03-04 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2005-04-19 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2005-04-19 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2005-10-19 — Paper received
  • 2005-10-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-10-31 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-11-04 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-11-04 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2006-02-10 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-03-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-05-04 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2006-05-05 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2006-05-05 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2006-11-08 — Paper received
  • 2006-11-08 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-11-27 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-11-28 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-12-08 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-12-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-06-11 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2007-07-17 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2007-07-17 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-07-17 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-01-22 — Paper received
  • 2008-01-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-01-23 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2008-01-25 — Suspension letter written
  • 2008-01-25 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-01-25 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-07-28 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2008-07-28 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2008-07-28 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-07-28 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-02-02 — Paper received
  • 2009-02-03 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-02-03 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2009-02-13 — Suspension letter written
  • 2009-02-13 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-02-13 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-08-17 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2009-08-26 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2009-08-26 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-08-26 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-03-01 — Paper received
  • 2010-03-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-03-02 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2010-03-15 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-03-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-03-15 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-09-23 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2010-10-12 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-10-12 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-10-12 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-04-18 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2011-05-11 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2011-05-11 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-05-11 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-11-17 — Paper received
  • 2011-12-06 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-12-06 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2012-01-04 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-01-04 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-01-04 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-07-10 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2012-07-17 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2012-07-17 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-07-17 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-01-22 — Paper received
  • 2013-01-30 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-01-30 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2013-01-30 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-01-30 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-01-30 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-08-05 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2013-08-10 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2013-08-10 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-08-10 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-02-18 — Paper received
  • 2014-02-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-02-26 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2014-03-03 — Suspension letter written
  • 2014-03-03 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-03-03 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-09-08 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2014-09-21 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2014-09-21 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-09-21 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2015-05-14 — Application abandoned
  • 2015-05-14 — Application abandoned
  • 2015-05-14 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Hanstep Co., Ltd
Seoul KR

Correspondent

BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP
224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600
CHICAGO, IL 60604
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2000-11-28
Status Date:
2015-05-14
Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.