Trademark search for:

MORE CHI

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2000-04-17 — Application filed
2000-09-21 — Assigned to examiner
2000-10-05 — Final disposition recorded
2001-04-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-05-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-08-15 — Notice of publication
2001-09-04 — Published for opposition
2001-09-27 — Extension of time to oppose received
2002-09-17 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2002-10-17 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2003-05-05 — Paper received
2004-03-23 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2004-04-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-06-22 — Case file in ticrs
2004-09-20 — Sou extension 1 filed
2004-09-20 — Sou extension 1 granted
2004-09-22 — Paper received
2005-03-21 — Paper received
2005-03-21 — Sou extension 2 filed
2005-03-21 — Sou extension 2 granted
2005-09-23 — Sou teas extension received
2005-09-23 — Sou extension 3 filed
2005-12-23 — Sou extension 3 granted
2006-03-21 — Sou teas extension received
2006-03-21 — Sou extension 4 filed
2006-04-11 — Sou extension 4 granted
2006-09-24 — Final status recorded
2006-11-29 — Application abandoned
2006-11-29 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

More Chi Productions, Inc.
New York , NY

More Chi Productions, Inc.
New York , NY

Correspondent

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC
866 UNITED NATIONS PLZ
NEW YORK, NY 10017
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2000-04-17

Status Date:
2006-09-24

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.