Trademark search for:

REV MASTER

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2000-09-16 — Application filed
2001-03-03 — Assigned to examiner
2001-03-13 — Final disposition recorded
2001-11-16 — Application abandoned
2002-01-14 — Petition to revive-received
2002-07-18 — Petition to revive-granted
2002-10-28 — Final disposition recorded
2002-12-27 — Office action issued
2002-12-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-02-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-04-02 — Notice of publication
2003-04-22 — Published for opposition
2003-07-15 — Registered-principal register
2007-11-28 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2008-05-21 — Case file in ticrs
2009-06-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2009-06-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2009-07-08 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2009-07-08 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2009-07-14 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2009-07-21 — Assigned to paralegal
2009-08-06 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2014-02-21 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2014-02-21 — Final status recorded
2015-11-25 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically

Owner Information

DYNOJET RESEARCH, INC.
Belgrade , MT

DYNOJET RESEARCH, INC.
Belgrade , MT

DYNOJET RESEARCH, INC.
Belgrade , MT

Correspondent

Kristine L. Butler Volpe and Koenig, P.C.
30 S. 17th Street, Suite 1600
Philadelphia, PA 19103
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2000-09-16

Status Date:
2014-02-21

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.