Brandinium

Trademark search for:

TENOVIS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2000-08-28 — Application filed
  • 2001-02-09 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2001-02-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2001-08-27 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2001-09-27 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2001-12-14 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2002-04-17 — Office action issued
  • 2002-10-21 — Paper received
  • 2002-10-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2002-11-01 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2002-11-07 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2002-11-07 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2002-11-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2003-01-08 — Notice of publication
  • 2003-01-28 — Published for opposition
  • 2003-04-22 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2003-08-18 — Paper received
  • 2003-08-18 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2003-08-18 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
  • 2004-02-02 — Paper received
  • 2004-03-19 — Paper received
  • 2004-04-06 — Registered-principal register
  • 2006-08-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2007-06-06 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2010-11-12 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2010-11-12 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Tenovis GmbH & Co. KG
60326 Frankfurt am Main DE
Tenovis GmbH & Co. KG
60326 Frankfurt am Main DE
Tenovis GmbH & Co. KG
60326 Frankfurt am Main DE

Correspondent

HAROLD V STOTLAND SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
131 S DEARBORN ST STE 2400
CHICAGO, IL 60603
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2000-08-28
Status Date:
2010-11-12
Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.