Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2000 ›
WH ›
WHISPERTEL
Trademark search for:
WHISPERTEL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2000-05-16 — Application filed
2000-11-16 — Assigned to examiner
2000-11-20 — Final disposition recorded
2001-04-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-08-13 — Assigned to examiner
2001-08-14 — Examiners amendment mailed
2001-08-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-12-19 — Notice of publication
2002-01-08 — Published for opposition
2002-04-02 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2002-10-02 — Sou teas extension received
2002-10-02 — Sou extension 1 filed
2002-10-23 — Sou extension 1 granted
2003-03-31 — Teas statement of use received
2003-03-31 — Use amendment filed
2003-04-28 — Statement of use processing complete
2003-04-29 — Assigned to examiner
2003-04-30 — Final disposition recorded
2003-10-30 — Office action issued
2003-10-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-11-13 — Case file in ticrs
2003-12-01 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2004-01-27 — Registered-principal register
2010-09-03 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2010-09-03 — Final status recorded
2011-07-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
WhisperTel Corporation
Nevada City , CA
WhisperTel Corporation
Nevada City , CA
WhisperTel Corporation
Nevada City , CA
Correspondent
Daniel R. McClure Thomas, Kayden, Horstemeyer & Risley, LLP 400 Interstate North Parkway SE Suite 1500 Atlanta, GA 30339
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2000-05-16
Status Date:
2010-09-03
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.