Brandinium

Trademark search for:

EPOCRATES HONORS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2001-05-02 — Application filed
  • 2001-07-03 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2001-07-09 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2001-08-15 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2002-02-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2002-04-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2002-10-17 — Paper received
  • 2002-10-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2002-10-17 — Sec. 1(b) claim added
  • 2002-12-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2003-02-26 — Notice of publication
  • 2003-03-18 — Published for opposition
  • 2003-06-10 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2003-12-08 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2003-12-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2003-12-08 — Use amendment filed
  • 2003-12-08 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2003-12-10 — Paper received
  • 2004-01-29 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2004-02-03 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2004-02-09 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2004-04-20 — Registered-principal register
  • 2004-05-19 — Paper received
  • 2004-10-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2007-12-17 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2007-12-17 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2008-07-30 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2009-02-19 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-02-19 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2010-04-21 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2010-05-04 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2010-05-05 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2013-10-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2014-01-06 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2014-01-06 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2014-04-16 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2014-04-16 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2014-04-30 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2014-04-30 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2014-04-30 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2014-04-30 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
  • 2014-11-05 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2014-11-05 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2016-03-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-03-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2018-07-25 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2019-02-20 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2019-10-08 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2019-10-08 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-02-17 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2023-04-20 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2023-10-23 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2023-10-23 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2023-10-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2023-10-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2023-10-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2024-11-01 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2024-11-01 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

EPOCRATES, LLC
Brighton , MA
EPOCRATES, INC.
Watertown , MA
ePocrates, Inc.
San Mateo , CA
ePocrates, Inc.
San Carlos , CA
ePocrates, Inc.
San Carlos , CA

Correspondent

JENNIFER HEISLER LAVALLEY GTC LAW GROUP PC & AFFILIATES
One University Ave., Ste 302B
Westwood, MA 02090
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2001-05-02
Status Date:
2024-11-01
Filing Year:
2001

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.