Brandinium

Trademark search for:

HOYALUX SUMMIT PRO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2001-05-17 — Application filed
  • 2001-07-18 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2001-07-25 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2002-04-30 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2002-10-29 — Paper received
  • 2002-10-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2002-12-26 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2003-04-22 — Paper received
  • 2003-04-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-04-22 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
  • 2003-05-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2003-07-16 — Notice of publication
  • 2003-08-05 — Published for opposition
  • 2003-10-28 — Registered-principal register
  • 2008-04-14 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2009-01-17 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2009-01-23 — Assigned to paralegal
  • 2009-03-14 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2011-07-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2011-07-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2011-08-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2011-08-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-09-16 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2013-09-16 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2013-09-16 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2013-09-17 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2013-09-17 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2013-09-17 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
  • 2014-01-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2016-02-26 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2016-02-26 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2017-06-12 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2017-06-12 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-01-28 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-01-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-01-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-01-28 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2021-01-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-01-28 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-04-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-04-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-04-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-05-06 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-05-06 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-05-06 — Teas withdrawal as domestic representative received
  • 2021-05-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2022-09-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2022-09-06 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2022-09-06 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2022-10-28 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2024-05-10 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2024-05-10 — Final status recorded
  • 2024-09-03 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2024-09-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2024-09-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2024-09-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed

Owner Information

Hoya Corporation
Tokyo JP
Hoya Corporation
Shinjuku-ku Tokyo JP
Hoya Corporation
Shinjuku-ku Tokyo JP

Correspondent

Jon Jekel Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
11682 El Camino Real, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92130
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2001-05-17
Status Date:
2024-05-10
Category:
Electronics & Software
Filing Year:
2001

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.