Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2001 ›
ID ›
IDEOPRAXIS
Trademark search for:
IDEOPRAXIS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2001-09-12 — Application filed
2001-11-07 — Assigned to examiner
2001-11-19 — Final disposition recorded
2002-02-08 — Examiners amendment mailed
2002-02-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-05-22 — Notice of publication
2002-06-11 — Published for opposition
2002-09-03 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2003-03-03 — Sou extension 1 filed
2003-06-07 — Application abandoned
2003-08-08 — Paper received
2003-08-08 — Petition to revive-received
2003-09-02 — Sou extension 1 granted
2003-09-03 — Sou extension 2 filed
2003-12-01 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
2003-12-29 — Sou teas extension received
2003-12-29 — Communication received from petitioner
2004-01-27 — Petition to revive-granted
2004-02-24 — Sou extension 2 granted
2004-03-01 — Sou teas extension received
2004-03-01 — Sou extension 3 filed
2004-03-09 — Sou extension 3 granted
2004-04-26 — Assigned to examiner
2004-07-29 — Case file in ticrs
2004-08-30 — Sou teas extension received
2004-08-30 — Sou extension 4 filed
2004-09-10 — Sou extension 4 granted
2005-03-04 — Final status recorded
2005-06-09 — Application abandoned
2005-06-09 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Bennett, John G.
Bellevue , WA
Bennett, John G.
Bellevue , WA
Correspondent
MICHAEL D BRANDT DURHAM BRANDT PLLC 1524 ALASKAN WAY, STE #100 SEATTLE, WA 98101 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2001-09-12
Status Date:
2005-03-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.