Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2001 ›
LI ›
LITHOTEC
Trademark search for:
LITHOTEC
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2001-07-23 — Application filed
2001-09-07 — Assigned to examiner
2001-09-24 — Final disposition recorded
2001-11-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-03-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-06-26 — Notice of publication
2002-07-16 — Published for opposition
2002-10-08 — Registered-principal register
2003-10-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-04-29 — Case file in ticrs
2008-09-17 — Paper received
2008-09-17 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2008-09-25 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2012-10-09 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2012-10-16 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2012-10-16 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2012-10-16 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
2013-08-14 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2013-08-14 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2013-08-14 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2021-10-08 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2023-04-21 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2023-04-21 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SCHOTT AG
55122 MAINZ DE
Schott Glas
D-55122 Mainz DE
Schott Glas
D-55122 Mainz DE
Schott Glas
D-55122 Mainz DE
Correspondent
Edward P. Kelly TIAJOLOFF & KELLY LLP 37TH FL 405 LEXINGTON AVE NEW YORK, NY 10174
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2001-07-23
Status Date:
2023-04-21
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.