Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2001 ›
ME ›
MEDTRONIC LINK
Trademark search for:
MEDTRONIC LINK
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2001-06-28 — Application filed
2001-09-05 — Assigned to examiner
2001-09-10 — Final disposition recorded
2002-03-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-03-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-03-22 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2002-04-15 — Final disposition recorded
2002-04-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-05-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-08-21 — Notice of publication
2002-09-10 — Published for opposition
2002-12-03 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2003-04-28 — Sou teas extension received
2003-04-28 — Sou extension 1 filed
2003-05-29 — Sou extension 1 granted
2003-11-21 — Sou teas extension received
2003-11-21 — Sou extension 2 filed
2003-12-04 — Sou extension 2 granted
2004-04-26 — Assigned to examiner
2004-05-24 — Sou teas extension received
2004-05-24 — Sou extension 3 filed
2004-06-01 — Case file in ticrs
2004-06-10 — Sou extension 3 granted
2004-11-30 — Sou teas extension received
2004-11-30 — Sou extension 4 filed
2004-12-07 — Sou extension 4 granted
2005-06-04 — Final status recorded
2005-09-27 — Application abandoned
2005-10-03 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
MEDTRONIC INC.
MINNEAPOLIS , MN
MEDTRONIC INC.
MINNEAPOLIS , MN
Correspondent
DANIEL W LATHAM 710 MEDTRONIC PKWY MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55432-5604 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2001-06-28
Status Date:
2005-06-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.