Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2001 ›
MU ›
MULTIEYE
Trademark search for:
MULTIEYE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2001-04-18 — Application filed
2001-07-27 — Assigned to examiner
2001-08-14 — Final disposition recorded
2002-02-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-07-01 — Office action issued
2002-09-18 — Paper received
2002-09-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-12-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-01-22 — Notice of publication
2003-02-11 — Published for opposition
2003-05-06 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2003-10-31 — Paper received
2003-10-31 — Use amendment filed
2003-12-04 — Statement of use processing complete
2003-12-15 — Case file in ticrs
2003-12-17 — Assigned to examiner
2004-02-02 — Final disposition recorded
2004-03-30 — Paper received
2004-03-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-04-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-05-03 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2004-07-06 — Registered-principal register
2010-06-16 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2010-07-03 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2010-07-03 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2015-02-13 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2015-02-13 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
ARTEC TECHNOLOGIES AG
D-49356 Diepholz DE
ARTEC TECHNOLOGIES AG
D-49356 Diepholz DE
ARTEC TECHNOLOGIES AG
D-49356 Diepholz DE
Correspondent
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, PC 1077 NORTHERN BLVD ROSLYN, NY 11576 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2001-04-18
Status Date:
2015-02-13
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.