Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2001 ›
NE ›
NECVOX
Trademark search for:
NECVOX
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-01-27 — Application filed
2005-02-05 — Application filed
2005-08-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-08-25 — Assigned to examiner
2005-08-26 — Assigned to lie
2005-08-30 — Law office publication review completed
2005-10-12 — Notice of publication
2005-11-01 — Published for opposition
2006-01-24 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-02-17 — Assigned to examiner
2006-03-29 — Teas statement of use received
2006-03-29 — Use amendment filed
2006-04-15 — Statement of use processing complete
2006-04-19 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2006-04-21 — Assigned to lie
2006-04-25 — Law office registration review completed
2006-06-06 — Registered-principal register
2011-08-04 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2011-09-13 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2011-09-13 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2011-09-13 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2015-06-06 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2017-01-13 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2017-01-13 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Punch Video Inc.
Tu-Cheng City, Taipei TW
Punch Video Inc.
Tu-Cheng City, Taipei TW
Punch Video Inc.
Tu-Cheng City, Taipei TW
Correspondent
James M. Slattery Birch, Stewart, Kolasch, & Birch, LLP P.O. Box 747 Falls Church, VA 22040-0747 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-01-27
Status Date:
2017-01-13
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.