Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2001 ›
SD ›
SD STRATEGYDYNAMICS
Trademark search for:
SD STRATEGYDYNAMICS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2001-02-14 — Application filed
2001-06-13 — Assigned to examiner
2001-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
2002-02-21 — Application abandoned
2002-03-04 — Petition to revive-received
2002-07-25 — Reinstated
2002-08-22 — Examiners amendment mailed
2002-09-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-10-07 — Assigned to examiner
2002-10-09 — Assigned to examiner
2002-10-09 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2002-10-09 — Assigned to examiner
2002-10-15 — Examiners amendment mailed
2002-10-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-04-11 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2003-04-15 — Examiners amendment mailed
2003-04-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-09-10 — Notice of publication
2003-09-22 — Paper received
2003-09-22 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
2003-09-30 — Published for opposition
2004-01-20 — Registered-principal register
2006-11-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-06-04 — Case file in ticrs
2010-08-27 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2010-08-27 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
GLOBAL STRATEGY DYNAMICS LIMITED
Buckinghamshire HP27 OAJ GB
GLOBAL STRATEGY DYNAMICS LIMITED
Buckinghamshire HP27 OAJ GB
GLOBAL STRATEGY DYNAMICS LIMITED
Buckinghamshire HP27 OAJ GB
Correspondent
MICHAEL J BUJOLD DAVIS & BUJOLD PLLC 112 PLEASANT ST CONCORD, NH 03301 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2001-02-14
Status Date:
2010-08-27
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.