Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2001 ›
SO ›
SOLARPAQ
Trademark search for:
SOLARPAQ
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2001-11-13 — Application filed
2002-02-14 — Assigned to examiner
2002-03-05 — Final disposition recorded
2002-09-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-09-09 — Paper received
2002-09-09 — Sec. 1(a) claim deleted
2002-09-26 — Sec. 1(b) claim added
2002-10-01 — Assigned to examiner
2002-11-20 — Office action issued
2002-12-30 — Paper received
2002-12-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-01-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-02-26 — Notice of publication
2003-03-18 — Published for opposition
2003-04-24 — Extension of time to oppose received
2003-07-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
2003-09-15 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2004-03-17 — Application abandoned
2004-03-17 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2004-03-17 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2004-03-17 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2004-03-17 — Final status recorded
2004-05-04 — Paper received
2004-06-02 — Paper received
2004-07-20 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2004-07-20 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2004-10-21 — Application abandoned
2004-10-21 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
Owner Information
ICP GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES
MONTREAL, QUEBEC CA
ICP GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES
MONTREAL, QUEBEC CA
Correspondent
CHARLES L GAGNEBIN III WEINGARTEN SCHURGIN GAGNEBIN & LEBOVICI TEN POST OFFICE SQ BOSTON, MA 02109 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2001-11-13
Status Date:
2004-03-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.