Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ARTREAD

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2002-07-12 — Application filed
  • 2003-01-15 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-01-15 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-01-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-07-23 — Paper received
  • 2003-07-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-08-14 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2003-09-24 — Office action issued
  • 2003-12-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-12-19 — Paper received
  • 2003-12-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-01-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2004-04-07 — Notice of publication
  • 2004-04-27 — Published for opposition
  • 2004-07-20 — Registered-principal register
  • 2006-08-21 — Paper received
  • 2006-09-23 — Review of correspondence complete
  • 2010-03-10 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2010-07-19 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2010-08-07 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2010-08-08 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2013-11-13 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2013-11-13 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2013-12-01 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2013-12-01 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2013-12-01 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2013-12-01 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - mailed
  • 2017-08-26 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2017-08-26 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2022-08-26 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2022-08-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2022-08-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2022-08-26 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2022-08-26 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
  • 2022-08-26 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2022-08-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2022-12-07 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2023-02-07 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2023-02-07 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2023-02-07 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2023-02-07 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2023-02-07 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2023-02-07 — Teas withdrawal as domestic representative received
  • 2023-02-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2023-07-20 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2024-06-26 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2024-06-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2024-06-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2024-06-26 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2024-06-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2024-06-26 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
  • 2024-07-22 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2024-07-31 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2024-08-30 — Office action issued
  • 2025-03-25 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)
  • 2025-03-25 — Notice of cancellation sec. 8 emailed
  • 2025-03-25 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

KÖRBER SUPPLY CHAIN LOGISTICS GMBH
KONSTANZ DE
SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Munchen DE
Siemens Dematic AG
Nurnberg DE
Siemens Dematic AG
Nurnberg DE
Siemens Dematic AG
Nurnberg DE

Correspondent

Thomas J. Mango CANTOR COLBURN LLP
20 Church St, 22nd Floor
Hartford, CT 06103-1221
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-07-12
Status Date:
2025-03-25
Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.