Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2002 ›
CH ›
CHANEY INSTRUMENT
Trademark search for:
CHANEY INSTRUMENT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2002-04-23 — Application filed
2002-08-23 — Assigned to examiner
2002-10-02 — Assigned to examiner
2002-10-02 — Assigned to examiner
2002-10-11 — Assigned to examiner
2002-12-02 — Final disposition recorded
2003-01-21 — Paper received
2003-01-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-05-08 — Office action issued
2003-11-03 — Fax received
2003-11-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-11-13 — Paper received
2003-12-19 — Case file in ticrs
2004-02-02 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2004-02-02 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2004-04-19 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2004-06-29 — Registered-supplemental register
2004-06-29 — Exparte appeal terminated
2004-11-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2004-11-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-04-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
2010-06-23 — Teas section 8 received
2010-06-24 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2010-06-30 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2015-01-30 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2015-01-30 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Chaney Instrument Company
Lake Geneva , WI
Chaney Instrument Company
Lake Geneva , WI
Correspondent
Barry W. Sufrin DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP SUITE 3700 191 N. WACKER DRIVE CHICAGO, IL 60606
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2002-04-23
Status Date:
2015-01-30
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.