Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2002 ›
ET ›
ETHERSYNC
Trademark search for:
ETHERSYNC
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-07-14 — Application filed
2014-07-17 — Application filed
2014-07-18 — Application filed
2014-07-19 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2014-10-24 — Assigned to examiner
2014-10-29 — Final disposition recorded
2014-10-29 — Final disposition recorded
2015-04-28 — Office action issued
2015-04-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-04-30 — Assigned to lie
2015-04-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-05-15 — Suspension letter written
2015-05-15 — Letter of suspension mailed
2015-08-03 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2015-08-11 — Assigned to lie
2015-08-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-08-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-08-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-08-31 — Law office publication review completed
2015-09-16 — Notice of publication
2015-10-06 — Published for opposition
2015-12-01 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-05-31 — Sou teas extension received
2016-05-31 — Sou extension 1 filed
2016-05-31 — Sou extension 1 granted
2016-06-02 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2017-01-02 — Application abandoned
2017-01-02 — Final status recorded
2017-01-03 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Cambrionix Ltd.
Cambridge GB
Cambrionix Ltd.
Cambridge GB
Correspondent
IAN D. GATES DASCENZO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C. 1000 SW BROADWAY STE 1555 PORTLAND, OR 97205-3064 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-07-14
Status Date:
2017-01-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.