Brandinium

Trademark search for:

INDAGON

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2002-05-20 — Application filed
  • 2002-09-11 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-09-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2002-11-12 — Paper received
  • 2002-11-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2002-11-27 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2003-07-30 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 2004-01-14 — Paper received
  • 2004-01-14 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-01-14 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
  • 2004-01-28 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2004-03-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2004-03-30 — Office action issued
  • 2004-09-24 — Paper received
  • 2004-09-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-11-06 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2004-11-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2004-11-29 — Assigned to lie
  • 2004-12-03 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2005-01-19 — Notice of publication
  • 2005-02-08 — Published for opposition
  • 2005-05-03 — Registered-principal register
  • 2006-11-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-02-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2012-09-21 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2012-09-21 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Indagon Oy
00400 Helsinki FI
Indagon Oy
00400 Helsinki FI
Indagon Oy
00400 Helsinki FI

Correspondent

Mark I. Peroff Hiscock & Barclay, LLP
Seven Times Square
New York, NY 10036
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-05-20
Status Date:
2012-09-21
Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.