Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2002 ›
NE ›
NEVOTV
Trademark search for:
NEVOTV
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2002-06-05 — Application filed
2002-11-01 — Assigned to examiner
2002-11-01 — Final disposition recorded
2003-04-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
2003-05-02 — Paper received
2003-05-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-06-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-07-09 — Notice of publication
2003-07-29 — Published for opposition
2003-10-21 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2004-04-21 — Sou teas extension received
2004-04-21 — Sou extension 1 filed
2004-04-26 — Case file in ticrs
2004-04-28 — Sou extension 1 granted
2004-10-15 — Sou teas extension received
2004-10-15 — Sou extension 2 filed
2004-10-28 — Sou extension 2 granted
2005-01-02 — Assigned to examiner
2005-04-07 — Sou teas extension received
2005-04-07 — Sou extension 3 filed
2005-04-07 — Sou extension 3 granted
2005-10-06 — Sou teas extension received
2005-10-06 — Sou extension 4 filed
2005-10-06 — Sou extension 4 granted
2006-04-11 — Sou teas extension received
2006-04-11 — Sou extension 5 filed
2006-04-11 — Sou extension 5 granted
2006-10-22 — Final status recorded
2006-12-28 — Application abandoned
2006-12-28 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Universal Electronics Inc.
Cypress , CA
Universal Electronics Inc.
Cypress , CA
Correspondent
MARK R GALIS GREENBERG TRAURIG, PC STE 2500 77 W WACKER DR CHICAGO, IL 60601-1732
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2002-06-05
Status Date:
2006-10-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.