Brandinium

Trademark search for:

OPTICAL HARDWEAR

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2002-06-24 — Application filed
  • 2002-10-08 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-10-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-04-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-04-18 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-05-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-06-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2003-07-23 — Notice of publication
  • 2003-08-12 — Published for opposition
  • 2003-11-04 — Registered-principal register
  • 2006-03-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2007-10-18 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2007-10-18 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2008-02-13 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2008-03-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2008-03-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-02-20 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2009-03-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-03-05 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2009-03-05 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2009-06-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-06-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-10-30 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2009-11-12 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2009-11-12 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2010-07-30 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2010-07-30 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-08-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2013-08-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2014-01-10 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2014-01-10 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2014-01-27 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2014-01-27 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2014-01-27 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2014-01-27 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
  • 2020-06-19 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2020-06-19 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-06-19 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-06-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-06-19 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-10-18 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
  • 2021-10-18 — Withdrawal of attorney granted
  • 2021-10-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-10-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-10-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2022-11-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2024-05-17 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2024-05-17 — Final status recorded
  • 2025-12-12 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2025-12-12 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2025-12-12 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2025-12-12 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2025-12-12 — Teas withdrawal as domestic representative received
  • 2025-12-12 — Teas change of correspondence received

Owner Information

LIVE EYEWEAR, INC.
San Luis Obispo , CA
Dioptics Medical Products, Inc.
San Luis Obispo , CA
Dioptics Medical Products, Inc.
San Luis Obispo , CA
Dioptics Medical Products, Inc.
San Luis Obispo , CA

Correspondent

LIVE EYEWEAR, INC.
149 Granada Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-06-24
Status Date:
2024-05-17
Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.