Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SWETS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2002-07-02 — Application filed
  • 2002-08-22 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-10-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2002-12-23 — Paper received
  • 2002-12-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-05-16 — Office action issued
  • 2003-11-10 — Paper received
  • 2003-11-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-11-10 — Sec. 1(b) claim added
  • 2003-12-22 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2004-06-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2004-07-26 — Paper received
  • 2004-07-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-08-03 — Assigned to lie
  • 2004-08-03 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2004-12-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2005-01-21 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-02-07 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-02-08 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2005-04-04 — Withdrawn before publication
  • 2005-04-11 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2005-05-03 — Priority action written
  • 2005-05-04 — Priority action mailed
  • 2005-06-07 — Office action issued
  • 2005-06-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-06-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2005-06-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2005-06-17 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-06-23 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2005-09-19 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2005-10-09 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2005-10-21 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2005-10-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2005-10-24 — Correspondence mailed
  • 2005-10-28 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-11-04 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-11-04 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2005-12-05 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2005-12-07 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2005-12-10 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2005-12-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2005-12-12 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2005-12-16 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-12-21 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2006-01-11 — Notice of publication
  • 2006-01-31 — Published for opposition
  • 2006-02-26 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2006-06-16 — Extension of time to oppose process - terminated
  • 2006-08-01 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2007-02-01 — Use amendment filed
  • 2007-02-05 — Paper received
  • 2007-05-23 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2007-07-27 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2007-09-05 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-09-05 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2007-10-09 — Registered-principal register
  • 2008-08-13 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2013-10-09 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2013-10-09 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 2013-10-18 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2013-10-21 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2013-10-21 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2016-10-09 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2016-12-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-05-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2018-05-11 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

SWETS INFORMATION SERVICES B.V.
2316 WZ Leiden NL
Swets & Zeitlinger Holding N.V.
CA Lisse NL
Swets & Zeitlinger Holding N.V.
CA Lisse NL
Swets & Zeitlinger Holding N.V.
Lisse NL

Correspondent

Margaret C. McHugh KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800
Mailstop: IP Docketing - 22
Atlanta, GA 30309

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-07-02
Status Date:
2018-05-11
Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.