Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2003 ›
09 ›
9BALLCONCEPT
Trademark search for:
9BALLCONCEPT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-09-29 — Application filed
2003-11-03 — Paper received
2004-04-09 — Assigned to examiner
2004-04-26 — Final disposition recorded
2004-07-23 — Paper received
2004-07-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-08-02 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-09-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-09-08 — Assigned to lie
2004-09-13 — Law office publication review completed
2004-10-20 — Notice of publication
2004-11-09 — Published for opposition
2005-02-01 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-07-04 — Paper received
2005-07-15 — Paper received
2005-07-15 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-08-15 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-01-25 — Sou extension 2 filed
2006-01-30 — Paper received
2006-02-28 — Sou extension 2 granted
2006-07-25 — Sou teas extension received
2006-07-25 — Sou extension 3 filed
2006-07-25 — Sou extension 3 granted
2007-01-24 — Sou teas extension received
2007-01-24 — Sou extension 4 granted
2007-01-24 — Sou extension 4 filed
2007-06-25 — Sou teas extension received
2007-06-25 — Sou extension 5 filed
2007-06-25 — Sou extension 5 granted
2008-02-04 — Final status recorded
2008-04-09 — Application abandoned
2008-04-09 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
DENSEI-LAMBDA K.K.
Tokyo JP
DENSEI-LAMBDA K.K.
Tokyo JP
Correspondent
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC 866 UNITED NATIONS PLZ NEW YORK, NY 10017 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-09-29
Status Date:
2008-02-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.