Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2003 ›
AE ›
AEROLEC
Trademark search for:
AEROLEC
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-07-27 — Application filed
2011-07-30 — Application filed
2011-08-01 — Application filed
2011-11-17 — Assigned to examiner
2011-11-18 — Examiners amendment -written
2011-11-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-11-18 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2011-11-18 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2011-11-18 — Examiner's amendment entered
2011-12-10 — Assigned to lie
2011-12-17 — Law office publication review completed
2012-01-04 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-01-24 — Published for opposition
2012-01-24 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-03-20 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-09-17 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2012-09-17 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2012-09-18 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-09-18 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2012-12-04 — Registered-principal register
2015-02-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-04-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-12-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2019-07-05 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2019-07-05 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
AEROLEC SAS
CHATOU FR
AEROLEC SAS
CHATOU FR
AEROLEC SAS
CHATOU FR
Correspondent
JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C. 4000 Legato Road, Suite 310 Fairfax, VA 22033 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-07-27
Status Date:
2019-07-05
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.