Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2003 ›
BE ›
BENDYGIRL
Trademark search for:
BENDYGIRL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-12-17 — Application filed
2004-01-07 — Application filed
2004-07-08 — Assigned to examiner
2004-07-09 — Final disposition recorded
2005-01-10 — Office action issued
2005-01-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-02-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-02-08 — Suspension letter written
2005-02-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2005-08-22 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2005-08-25 — Suspension inquiry written
2005-08-25 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2006-02-14 — Assigned to examiner
2006-02-27 — Office action issued
2006-02-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-03-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-03-21 — Suspension letter written
2006-03-21 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2006-10-10 — Suspension inquiry written
2006-10-10 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2006-10-10 — Assigned to examiner
2006-10-10 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2006-12-01 — Office action issued
2006-12-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-12-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-01-04 — Final disposition recorded
2007-01-04 — Final disposition recorded
2007-07-05 — Office action issued
2007-07-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-07-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-08-02 — Examiners amendment -written
2007-08-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-08-02 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-08-02 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-08-02 — Examiner's amendment entered
2007-09-10 — Assigned to lie
2007-09-10 — Law office publication review completed
2007-09-26 — Notice of publication
2007-10-16 — Published for opposition
2008-01-08 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-07-08 — Sou teas extension received
2008-07-08 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-07-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
2009-01-08 — Sou extension 2 filed
2009-01-12 — Paper received
2009-02-06 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-02-06 — Sou extension 2 granted
2009-07-07 — Sou teas extension received
2009-07-07 — Sou extension 3 filed
2009-07-10 — Sou extension 3 granted
2010-01-08 — Sou teas extension received
2010-01-08 — Sou extension 4 filed
2010-01-14 — Sou extension 4 granted
2010-07-08 — Sou teas extension received
2010-07-08 — Sou extension 5 filed
2010-07-13 — Sou extension 5 granted
2010-07-14 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-01-08 — Use amendment filed
2011-01-10 — Fax received
2011-01-11 — Statement of use processing complete
2011-02-01 — Final disposition recorded
2011-02-01 — Final disposition recorded
2011-02-01 — Final disposition recorded
2011-08-05 — Paper received
2011-08-11 — Amendment from applicant entered
2011-08-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-09-01 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2011-09-01 — Law office registration review completed
2011-09-01 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2011-09-01 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2011-09-01 — Examiner's amendment entered
2011-09-01 — Su-examiner's amendment written
2011-09-02 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2011-10-04 — Registered-principal register
2018-05-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2018-05-11 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Mansell Construction Limited
West Acton GB
Mansell Construction Limited
West Acton GB
Mansell Construction Limited
West Acton GB
Correspondent
JAMES MICHAEL FAIER FAIER & FAIER P.C. SUITE 600 566 W. ADAMS ST. CHICAGO, IL 60661
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-12-17
Status Date:
2018-05-11
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.